Update on ballot measures impacting Colorado tort reforms
Update on ballot measures impacting Colorado tort reforms
Monday, January 29, 2024
At the end of 2023, we provided you with an update on a looming effort threatening several of Colorado’s long-held tort reforms within the HCAA. Since December, ongoing efforts have progressed, and we want to keep you apprised on the latest developments.
What we know
On Jan. 18, two ballot measures, Initiative #149 and Initiative #150, were filed with the Colorado Legislative Council, kickstarting the process to be placed on the November ballot:
- Initiative #149 takes aim at the current medical peer review process by allowing patients access to any medical record, medical information or medical communication by a health care professional or institution if it relates to an “adverse medical incident,” including a near miss.
- Initiative #150 targets general liability caps currently in place in Colorado by eliminating non-economic damage caps in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases. This unlimited right to damages would apply regardless of any limit on any type of damages found in current law, such as caps on non-economic damages in medical liability cases.
What this means
Initiative #149
This aims to destroy the protections provided in the nearly 50-year-old Colorado Professional Review Act which the Colorado legislature overwhelmingly reauthorized after receiving a favorable recommendation from the Department of Regulatory Agencies’ 9-month sunset review. Professional Review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is the process to review and evaluate the competence, professional conduct of, or the quality and appropriateness of care provided by a physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse. A professional review committee can evaluate if a professional could benefit from additional education, or if the committee must take an adverse action which must be reported to the state licensing board. The protections afforded to this process by the Colorado Professional Review Act encourage reporting of potential unsafe care, willingness to be reviewed, and open, honest and objective discussion among the reviewers. This initiative would destroy the “safe space” needed to foster an environment where physicians, PAs, and APRNs can critically review the care of their peers and self-report when there is an adverse health care incident or near miss in the interests of improving care for all patients.
Initiative #150
Health Care Availability Act
For health care in Colorado to remain both affordable and accessible for patients and providers, a balanced liability climate is essential. If the cap on non-economic damages is eliminated as proposed in these initiatives, the cost of liability insurance for providers and health care facilities will be significantly impacted. This will drive up costs to a point where Colorado will no longer be an attractive place to practice medicine. This impacts all Coloradans, particularly those in rural areas and high-risk patients requiring specialty care, by making it more difficult to retain and recruit physicians and other healthcare professionals. This limits access to care, contributes to the rising costs of care, and leads to decreased quality of care.
Colorado General Liability
This initiative affects personal injury claims for medical liability as well as general liability for any business in the state. Hospitals, facilities, and clinics as businesses, however, will feel a double impact. The impact outside of healthcare would be felt by rising costs of property and casualty insurance, auto insurance, etc. These costs would particularly be felt by any business that has land or a building where someone could be injured, owns a fleet of vehicles, or has direct to consumer services or products that could potentially cause injury. While these costs will fall on businesses, these “cost of doing business” costs get passed down to consumers, impacting the quality and affordability of life for everyone in Colorado.
Our response
Shortly after these measures were filed, Coloradans Protecting Patient Access – the broader coalition representing healthcare in Colorado, of which the Colorado Medical Society is a member – filed two countermeasures with the Colorado Legislative Council. Both measures ensure that Colorado maintains transparent legal reforms, with a focus on impacted parties’ rights to recover fair compensation for damages. The first initiative (Initiative #170) caps attorney fees in cases of personal injury and wrongful death at no more than 25% of their client’s total damages award. The second initiative (Initiative #171), also known as a “sunshine law,” requires lawyers in personal injury and wrongful death cases to disclose litigation costs to be borne by clients in civil cases proactively and transparently. These measures ensure that an attorney will not benefit from high fees or a failure to disclose expected costs at the expense of their client’s ability to receive fair compensation for their injuries.
What’s next
We continue to work in close coordination with our partners at CMS, and the broader CPPA coalition that stands united on these issues. CPPA is currently leading a statewide proactive campaign (www.inyourcornerco.com) to lift up the crucial voices of providers across the state. This growing coalition is positioned to launch a statewide campaign to fight the damaging caps and peer review initiatives.
Rest assured that we are deploying all measures necessary to defend Colorado’s balanced and stable tort environment that has allowed Colorado to be a destination state to practice medicine and receive care. Keep an eye out for more updates and any Calls to Action to join this campaign effort and ensure we maintain a stable liability climate that benefits both patients and providers.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to Kate Alfano, CMS director of communications, at kate_alfano@cms.org.